Well, problems between Turkiye and Greece have existed for many years. The conflict in Cyprus has been frozen for over 50 years and this is nothing new in international relations to a certain extent both Greece and Turkiye were accepted into NATO.

Axar.az reports that Polish political scientist and journalist Dr.Jakub Korejba said in his statement.

Not to let them change this situation not to let this conflict and other conflicts possible conflicts between them and not to let them destabilize the situation. The current situation is stable and all major actors, both in Europe and worldwide are not interested in any conflict between Turkiye and Greece because they are located in a region strategically important for STA.

In the new conflicts conflict between Russia and Ukraine, no one is interested in destabilizing the situation in the Black Sea region and again and region in the eastern Mediterranean. In addition to that, having in mind the situation in the Middle East, no one is interested in having another conflict in this region, which means that the current status quo is the best thing that the world can get between and Greece. But at the same time, it is also nothing new that Greece is using Turkeys for internal propaganda to mobilize the electorate and its citizens to draw their attention to external so-called theoretical threats from internal problems. Greece has a lot of internal problems and the Turkish issue is serving Greek politicians to divert the attention of Greek citizens there. I don't think there can be any link between Turkish-Greek relations on the relations between Armenia and Azerbaijan are autonomous questions. Here again, all major players in the world in the current situation are interested in stabilization between Armenia and Azerbaijan. No one needs another conflict that is actively supporting Armenia cannot. That would be theoretically interested in weakening Turkiye or putting pressure on Turkiye. By linking Greece with Armenia. There is a will to do that, but there is no capability to do that. France is just not in a position to militarily and technically change any kind of balance of power and create physical pressure on Turkiye. That is why I think that the French, Greek and French-Armenian alliances are virtual Alliances and a lot of talk and no action because there can be no action in the current, that's why from the point of view of all the factors present today. Armenian - Azerbaijani conflict shall be ended or at least frozen in its current state but not transformed

into an active conflict once again because Armenia has no chance to win a war with Azerbaijan, just as Greece has no chance to win a war with both Yerevan and Athens. Understand and use this animosity for a propaganda issue to bargain to get more to sell this conflict an element of the negotiation of position.

The presence of such an alliance cannot create any military tension in the region, first of all, because there is no alliance between Greece and Armenia. Secondly, even if this alliance existed, it had no military potential. Greece, Armenia and to a certain extent France are either weak countries or declining countries. France is declining power, its power and its might shrinking and not expanding. This means that if you multiply zero, it gives you zero. Such an alliance would have an impact on the regional s.

There was a real power inside, which means that if Greece and Armenia found a major strong ally, this would not be the case because no one of the major powers in the world would be interested in supporting Greece or Armenia. After all, those two countries are not in a position To provide anything to any of the great powers. And that was confirmed by how the Russian-Armenian Alliance ended last year. Greece and Armenia are countries that are not happy with the existing regional order change, but they don't have such a capacity alone, which means that they are looking for other major powers to revise the order. Hopefully, the majority of countries are not interested in such revisionism in such revisionism which can be destructive create conflicts and even provoke wars. The main factor in Greece's arming of Armenia is a factor of informational war propaganda factor, not a real military factor. Greece cannot change the balance of power in supporting support to Greek support for Armenia is simply symbolic. It doesn't change. armenia's position with Partners. Both Greece and Armenia are revisionist countries. Greece wants to change the balance in Cyprus. Armenia wants to change the balance in the South Caucasus, but such a change of balance is not in the interests of other players and not in the interest of international security and peace. Such an alliance such as steps and even deliveries of weapons from Greece to Armenia represent an attempt to the position in the negotiations of Greece towards Turkiye and Armenia towards Turkiye. To propagate this, try to create a kind of situation where Turkiye may feel surrounded by potential enemies and therefore produce pressure on Ankara. This attempt is one to be successful because even together those countries are weaker than Turkiye and then there is no major power interested in making Turkiye in the region. Accordingly, the only major country would be France but France itself cannot deliver pressure to change Ankara's position. So this is a more of propaganda step than a real change in the regional balance of power.